Project CARS – New Developer Interview

The guys over at VVV Automotive have conducted an extensive interview with Andy Tudor, Creative Director behind Project CARS.

In the interview, Andy talks in-depth about the advantages of working with the backing of a huge community like World of Mass Development, licensing content, graphics & more.

The interview also touches on the big advancements made with the title’s physics engine in comparison to SMS’ previous Need for Speed Shift titles:

So with the Shift titles we were obviously moving iteratively towards a more ‘sim’ style title. Shift 1 was the introduction of circuit racing to the previously illegal action/arcade titles from previous years. Shift 2 then introduced the ‘Superman versions’ of road cars with GT3, GT1 and other forms of real motorsport with Drift, Drag, Time Attack, and Endurance. Each step of the way we were also adding more depth to the physics, handling, controls, options, and general realism whilst still maintaining that core experience of ‘what it really feels like out on the track’.

Compared to existing sim racing titles at the time though we still had a number of steps to go in terms of audience expectation on what they believed were key differentiators between the Shift titles and what they were used to and we appreciated those and have taken them on board wholeheartedly for Project CARS.

The steering wheel input lag issues [with Shift] for example were major, so we spent a good deal of time at the start of Project CARS making sure the new system was perfect and that it wouldn’t be tainting the feel of any other developments we were planning for the physics system. The force feedback system was redesigned from the ground up too. It now allows us the freedom to adjust the input of all tire, suspension and G-forces to control the effect that the player feels at the steering wheel and is all exposed per-car to the player so it can be tuned to their equipment and personal liking. This has been a huge step up from the broader approach used on the Shift games where a limited and fixed set of inputs were used and the only control dial the player had was for overall strength.

We’re also overhauling the tire model which is fully dynamic. The Seta Tire Model really is a generation beyond the steady-state models used in the past and it has forced us to step up our game in other areas as well, ensuring that every aspect of each car – aerodynamics, suspension and so on works up to the potential of the tire model. The perfect tire model is no good if those other parts aren’t all working in concert. As a generalization, the design of the Shift games required a huge amount of time balancing a large field of varied cars with multiple upgrade paths. For Project CARS, we are spending that time researching the details of each and every car to get the driving characteristics as correct as possible.

Make sure to check out the full interview here.

Project CARS is coming to the PC, Xbox 360, Playstation 3 and Wii U in 2014. More info can be found on the WMD website.

GTOmegaRacing.com

  • http://twitter.com/redrumoz Andrew Tiltman

    The game still sucks balls…

    • http://www.facebook.com/nicolas.grignon Nicolas Grignon

      say a lie a thousand times, it still be a lie…

      • http://www.facebook.com/wesley.modderkolk Wesley Modderkolk

        If he thinks that the game sucks balls it is an opinion

      • Anonymous

        The ‘ole Fox News/MSNBC mantra. Give both sides equal weight and respect despite one side having a reasoned response that adds to the conversation and the other just foaming at the mouth.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Markus-Ott/100000878526131 Markus Ott

    Ignorance still sucks balls…

  • Menco

    If they thought Shift was ‘sim’ style I’m not holding much hope for my copy of PCars now.

    • pez2k .

      In context, he’s saying that Shift was moving towards a sim style compared to the previous NFS games like Most Wanted, which is fair.

      • mrk1984

        The driving on Shift was unsatisfying and extremely unrealistic. There’s countless arcade/’simcade’ racers with more convincing physics.

        cheers

      • Realkman666

        To be fair, there’s a lot of complexity to the physics, but they just feel like cartoon land because they never made it all work to be authentic.

    • http://twitter.com/ARDallas68 Alan Dallas

      You need to learn to read. He is saying the Shift series was an iteration of a move TOWARDS simulator. Not that is was. Good grief.

      • Menco

        Exactly, a move towards, which means they think it actually has some sort of simulation. When in fact it is far from a simulation

      • http://www.facebook.com/mazda.mps.1 Mazda Mps

        Agreed.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Markus-Ott/100000878526131 Markus Ott

        Again: read it.
        He said it was a move towards simulation compared to the original Need for Speed franchise action racer, which is totally true.

      • Realkman666

        Real tracks doesn’t make for a simulation. NFS Porsche had real locations, still wasn’t a simulator. They disguised their shitfest as a simulator to trick people, but that’s all there was to it.

      • Anonymous

        Well I agree that real track locations or laser scanning is not necessary to create true simulation but you also have to remember SMS was calling very few of the shots when developing the shift series and had to answer to EA and it’s stock holders. If you want to point a finger point it at EA.

      • Realkman666

        I love blaming EA for stuff, but the Ferrari game still looks like it has fuzzy physics. They make great content but the driving is just not enjoyable.

      • Anonymous

        Yes they could have done better with TDFRL I agree but pCARS is nothing like that.

      • Den Burnout

        I noticed that also and understand your point. I’m not buying Pcars for other reasons and also won’t judge it either way unless I try it or see some views from people I trust but also don’t go by other people’s opinions completely. Hell, I’ve seen SHIFT2 on some forums referred to as a ‘sim’ which is laughable so when I see a developer say something similiar I do wonder what they consider a ‘sim’ or even a decent ‘arcade’. SHIFT2 wasn’t even a good arcade racer as it was undriveable. I say that also as I WANTED to like it but pretty graphics are useless if it’s crap to drive. I consider the SHIFT titles as big a let down as TDU2 was for arcade racers and I like arcade racers as well as sims. I do wonder when I see interviews like the above but I also know they may surprise people yet. The fact he admitted having to completely revamp the physics to take out the lag is at least a good sign it’ll be a decent arcade racer which even if it’s not ‘sim’ (I don’t see that myself as I understand it also coming out for consoles?) would be worth people buying it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/steve.shears.37 Steve Shears

        So what if its coming out on a console? The 360 is just a PC anyway. Do you think current consoles couldn’t do current sim physics? They don’t use a different type of math. Just that most console publishers won’t risk a harder game as it won’t appeal to the masses. Still if your looking for crap from a sim developer on a console just look at Simbin.

      • Charlie Runkles

        in comparison to previous NFS titles where you could take 90 degree corners at 180mph IT WAS actually different and definately a move forward… don’t you think?

      • C4

        Well, it’s a sim engine. The actual game is somewhere _between_ the classic NfSs and GT / Forza (maybe some PC sims at the end of that scale) so of course it’s not pure / core / whatever-you-want-to-call it -sim.

    • mrk1984

      PCARS is shaping up to be a solid sim.

      Shift 1/2 was a mess, better just forget them.

      • Realkman666

        Yes, forget SMS.

      • Anonymous

        You obviously do not know this developers entire history. They created very solid mods for the ISI EA F1 series of titles. You must be a NooB

      • Realkman666

        My being a noob doesn’t maker their physics engine any better.

      • Anonymous

        Well the best comment you have made so far is a good comment for Kunos and Assetto I will not argue that but you are very much off base with your comments toward SMS and pCARS.

      • Realkman666

        I would love to try the best cars right now, but I’m not in. I believe those who say they’ve improved the handling for certain cars and I’m sure it will be a great step away from Shift, but I don’t like their track record.

      • Anonymous

        Then look at what they have been faced with a big developer telling them we want this this and this and do it before this time or you don’t get paid. You go work under those conditions. Also I believe TDFRL was a title that was sitting on the shelf that they put just enough effort in it so it could be released as a Ferrari Fan title remember it is a test drive title and not intended to be full out sim.

      • Realkman666

        Agreed, but the discrepancy between content and physics is what annoys me the most, I suppose. A modern F1 that drifts around corners, for example. Even the older CM titles felt tighter than this, and I’m not even sure that kind of nonsense is more appealing to casuals who’d rather crash in traffic. I hope they’re evolving in the right way, because they’ve been between two chairs for a while.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-Cooper/100001266321716 Jason Cooper

      +1

    • Anonymous

      You have the finished retail copy of PCars in your hands? I thought it was still in development for the next year……….

    • Anonymous

      This title will be great your comment leads me to believe that you are not testing the game because we have many great cars already but the “my copy” part of your quote leads me to believe you are full member or better.
      Honestly tell me you think all of the cars are bad? I don’t think that is something that can honestly be said IMO. Do things need work? Yes the AI needs polish some tweaks to damage model and some optimizations need to be done for having many cars on the track. If SMS can get all the elements working great I see this as competing for a RGOY award.

      • Menco

        I have raced it from time to time, I am not on it for every new build. Some cars feel ok (and seem to be on the right track), others are all over the shop, which is fine because it is still in development But I hope they don’t think that they have truly captured a simulation with what they have so far, it is very much in the middle of the top sims like RF2, AC and iRacing and only slightly better than gt5.

        I hope they continue to further improve the game and it becomes a great title that truly represents a simulation rather than a run of the mill that is half simulation, half fluff and pretty graphics.

      • Guest

        in some ways i wish they did not allow the $25 dollar crowd into he beta. most don’t understand concept of development.

      • Menco

        Did you not read that I said I understand it is still in development?

      • Anonymous

        To me lack of realistic grip and overkill of snap oversteer is not good examples of realistic simulation. I can understand that is the way a good many of us came up in sim racing and what people have become accustom to. Where I draw the line at is when people think that anything less than those unrealistic behaviors is not simulation. Who cares if you want it harder than real life but get your facts straight.

      • Menco

        Where did I say that I want it harder than real life I think you might be the one getting the facts wrong.

      • Anonymous

        That just seems to be the general rule for the Hardcore Sim Racer and I am not against that or the titles that engage in the practice of making it harder than real life. If one looks at it as a training software simulation. They generally are harder than real life. ISI has claimed to have designed Military Class simulation which one would expect to be harder than real life. That does not mean that one that seeks to present itself in a true to life manner is not a simulation. We already have heard from many a pro driver that many of the current simulations represent a harder than real life scenario.

      • punkfest2000

        It’s always amusing when the real life race drivers try a sim and complain about the lack of grip not being realistic, and yet the bedroom racers deride the exact same sim for having too much grip, in the name of “realism”.

  • http://twitter.com/ARDallas68 Alan Dallas

    Didn’t take long for the trolls to appear. Looking at you Andrew.

  • mrk1984

    The first paragraph is laughable. Couldn’t go further.

    • http://twitter.com/ARDallas68 Alan Dallas

      Ohh an A.D.D. kid. Then I won’t take the time to explain it.

  • GamerMuscle

    With the entry level membership are we locked to the bad/old tire model ?

    At the moment with what I can access the physics are still WAY WAY WAY off from anything that could be considered a realistic simulation of how cars drive especially when you start to drive at the limit or introduce slip angles.

    A couple of cars are generally drivable and behave as you would expect with a bit of slip but even they seem overly placid and self correcting without any counter steer. Infact the cars tend to prefer the driver to not counter steer but just return wheel to centre until the back end comes in by itself.

    There is no input lag , but the cars flop around as soon as you lose grip or start to drive at the limit.

    What I don’t understand is if it is the case that basic members are limited to the old tire model , why SMS would limit them to something that makes the cars seem generally broken to drive?

    Still early days yet I hope they do get something decent working though would be nice to have a high profile multi-platform game with decent physics.

    • pez2k .

      The old tyre model is entirely gone now, except for the AI. There has been some playing about with implementing tyre compound swapping, and due to that it was possible to select non-existent tyres that did strange things last week. If you’ve changed tyres in the setup that might be causing issues.

      • GamerMuscle

        I cannot change tyres in the set-up that is all locked under the basic membership , I have installed the game from fresh each time I give it ago.

        The reason I ask is because on the forums X real world driver seemed to think that certain compounds behaved more realistic than others in terms of overall car behaver.

        I guess the physics still have a long way to go !

      • Neil

        Are you running the build that was release last Friday?

        The tyre options were only added to the vehicle setups a in the last couple of weeks. Prior to that there were some command line options for changing tyre compounds.

        The tyre model is not finished yet, there are several major features still either missing or disabled. Tyre heat and wear being the most obvious. Currently the tyres (and the track) are always operating at optimum temperatures. So you always have the maximum available grip.

      • pez2k .

        All that’s locked by membership level is some of the cars and tracks – if a feature doesn’t work it’s not implemented yet. The tyre compound selection that currently works is on the Global tab, not sure about the last Junior build but in build 465 it’s working only for cars that have multiple tyres to test (ie. Formula B).

        I was just ruling out a possible cause of your issue more than anything else – the non-existent tyres behaved really strangely.

      • Anonymous

        You’re confusing what’s locked by design to what’s locked based on your membership level. They don’t lock portions of the car setup screen unless they wanted it that way. One week the BMW Z4 GT3 has all options available and the next they only allow tire pressure tweaks because they’re testing something. Just how it goes.

        If you’re at a lower membership level you get fewer releases each month (perhaps just the one) and a few less cars and tracks.

    • C4

      The “bad” model you’re experiencing is the “Seta” tire model which they implemented a year ago or so.

      I agree on NkP and FVA they feel great and performance is quite accurate and realistic. But these 2 are simulation ;) . NkP runs on Laptop hardware so I guess there’s lots of stuff they can add or rewrite for AC to take advance of newer hardware.

    • Anonymous

      The old tire model had gotten pretty good before it was S**T canned and SMS feels the Seta TM can be that much better. If and when memberships will reopen for next phase of the project (new platforms) If you put forth enough funds you won’t be limited in any way shape or form. ATM I believe Sr. member(100euro) and above have no restrictions of content.
      @C4 no I think he’s talking about the old TM which is only being used for AI ATM

      • C4

        He did mention the _current_ build though or at least the last one that he could access.

        Btw.
        I put the bad into “s as I was quoting GamerMuscle. No idea why people need to downvote that.

    • http://twitter.com/TheRoggan Roger

      I agree

      My view is that pCars feels bad because its intended to be a pretty much “hardcore” sim but they havent been able to nail the physics model/setups yet.

      If they aimed at Arcade the cars would be drifting all over the place with ease or have super grip and instant brakes. That is not what I feel when I end up in the fence with a big “WTF” look on my face after trying to counter steer some induced oversteer.

      No arcade game has been this unpredictable and hard to drive, EVER! :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/gulyopapa Gulyás Tamás

    Never gonna be a sim. That’s too bad …
    But very good arcade could be …

    • http://www.facebook.com/nicolas.grignon Nicolas Grignon

      Are you prescient, do you see in the future? we (the community who are actively on SMS back) will make sure that pCARS is a solid sim. All the current developments points to a solid simulation. But I guess that for people like you, it won’t make any difference whatsoever.

      • http://www.facebook.com/gulyopapa Gulyás Tamás

        I play following SIM’s : iRacing, rF2, R3E(?) …
        The physics of pCars is light years from these ones.
        I feel they dont feel right direction of development.
        I play with pCars from the very beginning but the physics still VERY weak …
        pCars as a solid sim ? Khmmm …
        The best word for pCars physics : unpredictable !

      • http://www.facebook.com/nicolas.grignon Nicolas Grignon

        be patient and rant when the game is in beta stage (closer to the simulators you mentionned)… ATM it’s trial and error period, they try new things, we give feedback, they tune it, we try again, etc… reserve your judgment when the team (and us) will be happy of the long hard work to produce accurate physics from scratch (STM model).

      • http://www.facebook.com/gulyopapa Gulyás Tamás

        I would be the happiest man if this game became hardcore sim :)

      • Big Ron

        Always saying, you would be happy to see pCARS getting a real sim and that it becomes successful, but starting all of your posts with some judgements how arcade pCARS is and that it´s no sim LOL

      • Anonymous

        I agree people just have the I want it now attitude and mindset and I really don’t hold it personally against them because I know there is a good chance that their words will bite them in the A** some day and they have to live with it not I. I have enough of my own S**T to live with LOL

      • Realkman666

        Not the only one! Thanks Kunos for Assetto!

      • Anonymous

        Naw let them continue with their words of poor use. Maybe we should copy and paste these to use them later when they are speaking a different tune toward the title. The “look you remember when you said this” head slap

      • Anonymous

        Just wait till they see the new gearbox model and that it will be more realistic than any other sim. I am sure they will cry about that as well.

  • Guest

    those crying it is not a sim.. learn to race with the aids off and fb off or on low.. also if your running 900 degrees on road tracks you might be completely clueless.

    • Realkman666

      My what? My running?

  • Papa

    took me some time to understand the ongoing process, but the latest builds convinced me that pCars will be awesome. The Formula B is fantastic out of the box and beats every open wheeler from “the other sim in development”.
    It will stay that way, some cars in some builds will be wonky, others awesome, next build all cars are wonky, I´ll pause for a week, next build keeps me on the wheel for hours trying to drive every car on every track
    And if pCars is “arcade”, then hell yes, I´m an arcade racer. I don´t mind.

    • Anonymous

      No it’s not an arcade racer and you really should not feed trolls because they suffer from lack of oxygen to the brain and will misinterpret anything that is said. It’s really not their fault they have been brainwashed by the dark side of the force. Just let them be and they will be happy with their toe nail stew.

      • Anonymous

        hahaha toe nail stew, sound delicious!

        I personally can’t wait to see where Project CARS ends up! Because SMS working with the community are the guys for the job.

  • REALSimRACER

    We’ve been reading all posts about pCARS here at VirtualR.net (the website maintainer is an employee of the studio behind pCARS) and after all this time (it’s been something like almost 2 years now, and the game is far from being released) the game doesn’t have an identity, a personality yet. It’s more like an arcade and “looks”, again just look likes a sim.

    I don’t want to be that guy who acts as a fanboy, no I don’t, but it’s difficult to know what the game is after all the info we have.

    PCARS, what are your identity, your personality? Are you a sim, an arcade, what?

    We (sim community) would really like to know what the PCARS identity is.

    I personally hope that the final product has a better marketing, better brand as a sim, not an arcade, though the DNA of this project comes from an arcade developers community.

    Cheers!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Markus-Ott/100000878526131 Markus Ott

      Yeah, the realsimracer calls SMS a developer with an arcade background. Valid post.

      • Jos

        forgot about shift 1 and 2?

      • Realkman666

        The only good handling they’ve made is M3 Challenge. Their last 3 games have been garbage.

      • Anonymous

        What? you didn’t like GTR, GTR2, or GTL? Oh or did you just forget that the SMS core team is responsible for developing those titles

      • Realkman666

        Those are even older.

      • Anonymous

        But SMS still has copies of all that material to refer to

      • http://www.facebook.com/steve.shears.37 Steve Shears

        They were working under a publisher known for dictating content. They had to adhere to what EA wanted from the NFS game. Its funny – they didn’t (as Blimey games) have a time constraint for GTL or GTR2 and they wern’t told what to put in. Yet they did for the shift series in a limited time. And it was poorly received. Now i wonder why that was?

      • http://twitter.com/Michael_42 Michael

        “Now i wonder why that was?”

        That’s easy to answer, the people at SMS – not EA, made claims in interviews about their games that were either false or neglected to mention all of this “EA made us do it” stuff.

        These interviews and posts were often made directly to the sim community. See for example the interviews from the “physics guys” in autosimsport magazine.

        There’s no “the physics are crap in shift 1 because EA made us do it” – quite the opposite. They, like Bell, are full of piss and vinegar about how great the physics and handling are and how it’s the most advanced engine.

        All of this “EA made us do it” stuff said years after the games were being sold doesn’t negate all the stuff they said before and whilst the games were being developed, marketed and pushed by SMS.

        It wasn’t time that made Shift 1 and 2 poor games.

        It’s also worth noting that GTR2 had (and still has on Simbin’s site) the tag line “absolute authentic physics” which is complete and utter nonsense.

        Saying nonsensical OTT and hyped things about their products isn’t something EA made Simbin or SMS’s various incarnations do. Practically every time Bell opens his mouth some ridiculous hyperbole comes out of it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/steve.shears.37 Steve Shears

        Of course it was. Look how long its taking them to do something properly. Do you honestly think EA said – oh take as long as you want? Of course they didn’t. So they didn’t really get the time to do anything with their old engine. I tell you what – go and look at how many reiterations the Shift 2 mod has had on. I’m not doubting Ian properly said stuff that only sold his game – any dev would say that – else they’d be stupid because EA would rip them to shreds. But things HAVE changed now. Ian’s made apretty ballsy decision to get the community on board. I don’t see EA doing that. At least it proves they want to try. And BTW who’s the publisher of GTR2? Is it SMS? Didn’t think so. So who decides what that says on the publishers website? Thats a pretty poor shot and does nothing for your argument against Ian or SMS.

    • Anonymous

      sound like david is back on vr

    • http://twitter.com/ARDallas68 Alan Dallas

      It’s target is a full on Race Simulator.

      Have a question for you though REALSimRACER. Did you play GTR or GTR2? Did you consider them a Simulator? A lot of people did and still do and those titles are ancient. They also happen to be SMS(called Blimey! Games back then) titles.

      Have some faith and reserve judgement for when it is finished. It’s still very much in an Alpha state. None of the current features or physics are completed. Their is still a lot of planned features to even make it to a current build. They have a goal and I for one I’m proud to be a part of it during the testing phase.

      BTW, do yourself a favor and look up the definition for Simulator. People always tend forget the part of the definition were it defines a simulation to be a “likely approximation” of a real phenomenons actual performance. Or as close as you can get to the real thing. A simulation by it’s very nature is NEVER going to be like the real thing.

      • Anonymous

        And don’t you forget, GTR & GTR2 was created using the Image Space Inc (ISI) Pmotor & Gmotor Engine. ;)

      • http://twitter.com/ARDallas68 Alan Dallas

        I didn’t forget that. But others tend to think SMS is not capable because they forget the head of studio’s simulation background. They know what needs to be done to make a Simulator. Weather it is a licensed engine or one of their own design.

      • http://twitter.com/StarFoXySxv550 StarFoXySxv550

        “They know what needs to be done to make a Simulator”
        True, but it remains to be seen whether they “will do what they know needs to be done”. GTR1 & 2 was then, this is now.

      • Anonymous

        Ian and his guys were Simbin modding the ISI EA F1 series of titles and had 2 GTR mods before the release of GTR1 Henrik I believe bought the SimBin name thus a name change to Blimey for Ian.

  • Novi32

    I try again this game when we get proper three screen support, I think is not happend in this year.

    • Anonymous

      Works fine for me… they now allow you to adjust your own HUD somewhat… drag and drop info panels

    • furiousgibbon

      I find that if I play AC, then pCars, I can’t handle the stretched/warped side screens. So I don’t play them in that order anymore. I’m also still waiting for TrackIR support… long time coming.

      At the moment though, E30 M3 feels tight and I can’t stop driving it. In the last few builds it feels like they’ve dialled back the ‘floaty’ camera which had made a big difference in how the game feels.

    • http://twitter.com/TheRoggan Roger

      Im waiting for proper 3D support, cant drive or play anything in 2D anymore, its just not anywhere near as immersive.

      All other major driving sims have very good 3D support, AC is the new benchmark (in this area as well!).

      I know they are working now on the 3D support so its just a matter of time, but hope they get there soon!

  • speed1

    No doubt, it is the most impressive game so far on images but here is still a long time before we can assess it as a final product and i hope the result will satisfy . Until then, I wish continued success.

    • Anonymous

      How have you been? There may be a chance for you to get back in soon. I still am shocked you got yourself removed.

      • speed1

        Thank you mate, i’m fine and i hope you as well.

        I do not believe and see no real chance that I can come back ever. And I’ve not even removed me by myself, i only get what i have deserved.

      • Anonymous

        You were a very positive member that did what you could to get yourself removed you even admitted it was done purposely. IMO you could get back in with an apologetic email

      • speed1

        I’m not shure about the positive member part, may i did what i could to be negative, even if it was never my real intention. I’m sure the one or other was relieved even if I miss dev’s like A.G and many other’s but mainly A.G was one of my favorites. It’s all right as it is. I wish you and SMS all the best. ;-)

  • Anonymous

    When Shift came out the devs tried to not mention the “arcade” word, instead of that they came with vague concepts like the “best racing experience simulator”. Now they just admit it was a hardcore arcade and they never aimed for simracing. The big reason for this deceiving marketing is EA. I hate it when companies like EA do that and anything linked to EA will have my doubt from the beginning.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Markus-Ott/100000878526131 Markus Ott

      Not only that. Everyone believed they would make a sim out of Shift because of their (EAs) statements. They didn’t say a word the claims that Shift is gonna be a sim are wrong and that they would only simulate the feeling how it is to be a in cockpit while racing. But tbh I don’t know how Shift simulates reality in that way, if it would shake like in Shift you would get seasick after the first lap, it is nowhere near reality, it is just an overdone arcadish element. Even more than the driving model itself.

      • Anonymous

        EA stands for Everything Arcade

Back to top