felipe:
I never said that but you are the one saying GPL has shit graphics! Would rather the girl next door or some blur girl you can’t see properly. People should stop underrating graphics it’s the second most important thing in a sim after physics and why? Because it’s recreation of real life and the more it look real the more sim the game will be!

Having good graphics is always welcome. Although as others have said I’d rather have great sound.

But Gameplay will always win over graphics. For example Shift obviously look far better than GPL. But I do not enjoy the physics or gameplay of Shift. But I still love driving those 60′s cars in GPL. No other sim feels quite like it. I have so much fun with it that I quickly forget it’s dated look when driving it. It is of no importance to me.

Personally I obviously rate physics as most important in a sim. Followed by force feedback, sound, accurate tracks (if real tracks are used) then graphics.

A nice looking game is great, but for a sim it’s of relatively low importance to me. As long as the graphics are “good enough” I do not take them into consideration when rating it.

stabiz: Setting physics aside, I would rather have great sounds and average graphics than great graphics and average sounds.

I ‘hear’ that, lol!

(yeah you can facepalm that pun)

we’ll be lucky if any sim on pc in the next 5 years looks as good as that.

r8response:
By using your assumptions, Grand Prix Legends is a shit game.

I never said that but you are the one saying GPL has shit graphics! Would rather the girl next door or some blur girl you can’t see properly. People should stop underrating graphics it’s the second most important thing in a sim after physics and why? Because it’s recreation of real life and the more it look real the more sim the game will be!

steve30x:
Now grow up will you and stop being a fanboy.

sorry

felipe:on another note ANYONE who says that you don’t need great graphics in a game only says it cause they don’t have it.

By using your assumptions, Grand Prix Legends is a shit game.

FooAtari:
So? Just because most people use rFactor, that doesn’t mean it has the best physics. Thats like saying your average 4 door saloon is better than an Aston Martin Vantage just because it’s what most people use…And felipe, your childish rants never fail to amaze me. Grow up man.

As far as race customisation goes private lobbies and such will all be available.

donbobo:
I agree it would be nice to have it, but it won’t, it would require all the customisation options of rfactor/gtr to get the most out of it (for some reason it’s assumed console gamers don’t want options), and a lot of extra development time and money to get the physics and realism to that level. Also the lack of racing options and features will not tempt many PC sim players anyway.

PS, rFactor and Simbin games are held up as the benchmark for PC sims because 90%+ of PC sim racers use these titles, and that doesn’t look like it will change before GT5 is released.

So? Just because most people use rFactor, that doesn’t mean it has the best physics. Thats like saying your average 4 door saloon is better than an Aston Martin Vantage just because it’s what most people use…

And felipe, your childish rants never fail to amaze me. Grow up man.

jonneymendoza: The physics and overal feel of the game has been re-done apparently. You say this game is catered for the masses right? whats wrong with having a game mode or feature that minics all the great aspects that make rfactor feel real when racing to cater for such fans?Yes its a multi million pound product so surely adding a few 1000’s of players who are massive fans of rfactor/iracing will only benifit PD even more right?Again, i dont see NO reason why it cant cater for us hardcore racers as well as casual racers.

I agree it would be nice to have it, but it won’t, it would require all the customisation options of rfactor/gtr to get the most out of it (for some reason it’s assumed console gamers don’t want options), and a lot of extra development time and money to get the physics and realism to that level. Also the lack of racing options and features will not tempt many PC sim players anyway.

felipe: – Both night racing and weather effects will make their debut in a GT-series title

Here this is just for you who cant read.

- Both night racing and weather effects will make their debut in a GT-series title. You couldnt help yourself though. I never once mentioned Forza 3 so what has that got with what I said. I am actually looking forward to GT5. Now grow up will you and stop being a fanboy.

steve30x:
This still doesnt mean that Night driving and Wet races are debuting in GT5.

cry it how much you want guess another bottie lying to himself and can’t even read the thing properly lol! Just read the damn thing properly do you really think the just Turned 10 Flopza 3 could really rival the almighty PD! I wonder how those MS suckers are gonna explain scoring GT5 just 1 point over flopza 3 as most scored it 9/10 or higher!

on another note ANYONE who says that you don’t need great graphics in a game only says it cause they don’t have it.

Montoya: Both the past night racing and wet track were static so that dosen’t really count if you ask me.GT5 will have proper night/daylight effects and real rain, not just a track that is miraculously soaking wet.

This still doesnt mean that Night driving and Wet races are debuting in GT5.

r8response:
Of which there are few and far between.Just look at your first post in this article.Pretty much proves my point

But after that, my posts have been on point and relivent. ignore the fanboy shit and read the good stuff

stabiz:
You sir, would have been one of those who cheered at Chamberlains Munich deal in 1938. I dont care what the difference in lap times are, I care how the cars handle. The only thing i can judge that from (so far) is GT5P.

then you played GT5p and if you played it you know it isn’t close to the Time trial version in which case you would know it is NOT the product people will buy in stores! IF you know all that how come you still try to argue