<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bob&#8217;s Track Builder Evo &#8211; Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released</link>
	<description>100% Sim Racing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piddy</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19862</link>
		<dc:creator>Piddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19862</guid>
		<description>I would not like to see all BTB tracks put in the same basket. Sure crap tracks are very easy to make, but for the few guys that are doing great work it would be a shame for them not to get the exposure they deserve.

rFC allows you to sort tracks by ranking which works pretty well if you&#039;re after only the best.

If the ranking system was locked for two days after any new track release, it would reduce the amount of knee-jerk voting and making sorting by ranking even better.

Although having said that, sometimes there are tracks that don&#039;t look so good, but are still great fun to drive. Then there are some that look great, but are boring to drive. It&#039;s good to have choice.

Also BTB is great for private use; it&#039;s fun to bring your own ideas to life no matter how whacky they might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not like to see all BTB tracks put in the same basket. Sure crap tracks are very easy to make, but for the few guys that are doing great work it would be a shame for them not to get the exposure they deserve.</p>
<p>rFC allows you to sort tracks by ranking which works pretty well if you&#8217;re after only the best.</p>
<p>If the ranking system was locked for two days after any new track release, it would reduce the amount of knee-jerk voting and making sorting by ranking even better.</p>
<p>Although having said that, sometimes there are tracks that don&#8217;t look so good, but are still great fun to drive. Then there are some that look great, but are boring to drive. It&#8217;s good to have choice.</p>
<p>Also BTB is great for private use; it&#8217;s fun to bring your own ideas to life no matter how whacky they might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 23:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19861</guid>
		<description>no I didnt mean that lol, I mean everything in rfactor requires skills to make, not only tracks but also carmods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no I didnt mean that lol, I mean everything in rfactor requires skills to make, not only tracks but also carmods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19856</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 20:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19856</guid>
		<description>Well you can criticise in two ways: Negative or Constructive.
Criticism is good but only in the constructive way. negative criticism never gets anyone anywhere.
Special section for BTB tracks? Don&#039;t make me laugh nearly all tracks in rFactor are made with BTB these days. I say better have those tracks than not.
And Jos what are you saying? You can&#039;t honestly say everything in rFactor is crap can you?
If you still think so i would suggest you to fire up CTDP06 on Bahrain 2006 and then honestly say it sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you can criticise in two ways: Negative or Constructive.<br />
Criticism is good but only in the constructive way. negative criticism never gets anyone anywhere.<br />
Special section for BTB tracks? Don&#8217;t make me laugh nearly all tracks in rFactor are made with BTB these days. I say better have those tracks than not.<br />
And Jos what are you saying? You can&#8217;t honestly say everything in rFactor is crap can you?<br />
If you still think so i would suggest you to fire up CTDP06 on Bahrain 2006 and then honestly say it sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samanthaUK</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19849</link>
		<dc:creator>samanthaUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19849</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-19823&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-19823&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UncleChuckle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
The only problem with BTB is it’s lowered the entry bar for track design, meaning that more and more poor quality tracks are appearing. Sure, you can do great stuff in it. Sadly a lot of people who lack the ability to make decent tracks use BTB. Some of the rFactor ones made with BTB I’ve seen lately have been truly terrible. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 Agreed, looking at the most recent releases, on RFC says it all, not suppose to criticize? criticism is good, if you dont, they think they are doing it right, rfc should have a sub section for BTB tracks.
@ Jos what planet are you on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-19823">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-19823" rel="nofollow">UncleChuckle</a></strong>:<br />
The only problem with BTB is it’s lowered the entry bar for track design, meaning that more and more poor quality tracks are appearing. Sure, you can do great stuff in it. Sadly a lot of people who lack the ability to make decent tracks use BTB. Some of the rFactor ones made with BTB I’ve seen lately have been truly terrible.
</p></blockquote>
<p> Agreed, looking at the most recent releases, on RFC says it all, not suppose to criticize? criticism is good, if you dont, they think they are doing it right, rfc should have a sub section for BTB tracks.<br />
@ Jos what planet are you on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19847</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19847</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-19823&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-19823&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UncleChuckle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
The only problem with BTB is it’s lowered the entry bar for track design, meaning that more and more poor quality tracks are appearing. Sure, you can do great stuff in it. Sadly a lot of people who lack the ability to make decent tracks use BTB. Some of the rFactor ones made with BTB I’ve seen lately have been truly terrible. 
Yes, I realize we’re not supposed to criticize and give anyone who contributes to the community a big warm hug regardless of how crap or useless their contribution is… Therein lays the path to mediocrity and disappointment.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

well the same counts for everything in rfactor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-19823">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-19823" rel="nofollow">UncleChuckle</a></strong>:<br />
The only problem with BTB is it’s lowered the entry bar for track design, meaning that more and more poor quality tracks are appearing. Sure, you can do great stuff in it. Sadly a lot of people who lack the ability to make decent tracks use BTB. Some of the rFactor ones made with BTB I’ve seen lately have been truly terrible.<br />
Yes, I realize we’re not supposed to criticize and give anyone who contributes to the community a big warm hug regardless of how crap or useless their contribution is… Therein lays the path to mediocrity and disappointment.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>well the same counts for everything in rfactor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kill4f00d</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19840</link>
		<dc:creator>kill4f00d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 15:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19840</guid>
		<description>The the crappy tracks are coming from people that don&#039;t put enough time into their work. I&#039;m sure if you try really hard, you can make your track look pretty decent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The the crappy tracks are coming from people that don&#8217;t put enough time into their work. I&#8217;m sure if you try really hard, you can make your track look pretty decent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trebor901</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19832</link>
		<dc:creator>trebor901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 11:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19832</guid>
		<description>I didnt realise the Simbin version of BTB would need to be bought completely seperate, i would much rather have the Simbin one than the one for rFactor that ive got at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt realise the Simbin version of BTB would need to be bought completely seperate, i would much rather have the Simbin one than the one for rFactor that ive got at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floptickle</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19830</link>
		<dc:creator>Floptickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 10:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19830</guid>
		<description>Thats true... But then again. Learning by doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats true&#8230; But then again. Learning by doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UncleChuckle</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualr.net/bobs-track-builder-evo-released/comment-page-1#comment-19823</link>
		<dc:creator>UncleChuckle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 04:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualr.net/?p=3351#comment-19823</guid>
		<description>The only problem with BTB is it&#039;s lowered the entry bar for track design, meaning that more and more poor quality tracks are appearing. Sure, you can do great stuff in it. Sadly a lot of people who lack the ability to make decent tracks use BTB. Some of the rFactor ones made with BTB I&#039;ve seen lately have been truly terrible. 

Yes, I realize we&#039;re not supposed to criticize and give anyone who contributes to the community a big warm hug regardless of how crap or useless their contribution is... Therein lays the path to mediocrity and disappointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with BTB is it&#8217;s lowered the entry bar for track design, meaning that more and more poor quality tracks are appearing. Sure, you can do great stuff in it. Sadly a lot of people who lack the ability to make decent tracks use BTB. Some of the rFactor ones made with BTB I&#8217;ve seen lately have been truly terrible. </p>
<p>Yes, I realize we&#8217;re not supposed to criticize and give anyone who contributes to the community a big warm hug regardless of how crap or useless their contribution is&#8230; Therein lays the path to mediocrity and disappointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

